1981 Zastava 102 vs. 2010 Ford Flex
To start off, 2010 Ford Flex is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Flex weights approximately 1254 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 1981 Zastava 102 has manual transmission. 1981 Zastava 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Zastava 102 | 2010 Ford Flex | |
Make | Zastava | Ford |
Model | 102 | Flex |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1302 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 774 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2995 mm |