1981 Zastava 102 vs. 2011 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XJ is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XJ (510 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 461 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1172 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XJ (624 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 529 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 102 | 2011 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Zastava | Jaguar |
| Model | 102 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 510 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 624 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1942 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5123 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 3033 mm |
