1981 Zastava 102 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Colorado (186 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 779 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Colorado (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 102 | 2012 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | Zastava | Chevrolet |
| Model | 102 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 186 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1549 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2830 mm |
