1981 Zastava 102 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 967 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 102 | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Zastava | Chevrolet |
| Model | 102 | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1737 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2857 mm |
