1981 Zastava 102 vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 435 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 2013 Mini Cooper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mini Cooper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Cooper (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (78 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 102 | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
| Make | Zastava | Mini |
| Model | 102 | Cooper |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2013 |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 78 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3723 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1407 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2467 mm |
