1981 Zastava 132 vs. 2010 Honda Jazz

To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 132 (106 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2010 Honda Jazz. (77 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Jazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 132 weights approximately 47 kg more than 2010 Honda Jazz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1981 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 132 (142 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Jazz. (110 Nm). This means 1981 Zastava 132 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Jazz.

Compare all specifications: