1981 Zastava 1500 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, both 1981 Zastava 1500 and 1981 Zastava 102 were released in the same year (1981). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,480 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 1500 (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 1500 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 186 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 1500 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Zastava | Zastava |
| Model | 1500 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1480 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2160 mm |
