1981 Zastava 750 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 750. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 750.
Because 1981 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Zastava 750 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Zastava | Ford |
Model | 750 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2490 mm |