1981 Zastava 850 K vs. 2000 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2000 Smart ForFour is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Smart ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Smart ForFour (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Smart ForFour weights approximately 120 kg more than 1981 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 850 K | 2000 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Zastava | Smart |
| Model | 850 K | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1499 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1460 mm |
