1981 Zastava 850 K vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 893 kg more than 1981 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 850 K | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Zastava | Cadillac |
| Model | 850 K | CTS |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2880 mm |
