1982 Abarth A 112 vs. 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1982 Abarth A 112 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 715 kg more than 1982 Abarth A 112.
Because 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Abarth A 112 | 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
| Make | Abarth | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | A 112 | 6C |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 2443 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 105 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2710 mm |
