1982 Abarth A 112 vs. 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk
To start off, 1982 Abarth A 112 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk would be higher. At 3,042 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk weights approximately 671 kg more than 1982 Abarth A 112.
Because 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk has automatic transmission and 1982 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1982 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Abarth A 112 | 1958 Studebaker Silver Hawk | |
Make | Abarth | Studebaker |
Model | A 112 | Silver Hawk |
Year Released | 1982 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 3042 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1356 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3070 mm |