1982 Abarth A 112 vs. 1959 Austin A 95
To start off, 1982 Abarth A 112 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Austin A 95 weights approximately 640 kg more than 1982 Abarth A 112.
Because 1959 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Abarth A 112 | 1959 Austin A 95 | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin |
| Model | A 112 | A 95 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1959 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 2638 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2690 mm |
