1982 Abarth A 112 vs. 1961 Austin A 40
To start off, 1982 Abarth A 112 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 965 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Abarth A 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A 40 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1982 Abarth A 112.
Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Abarth A 112 | 1961 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin |
| Model | A 112 | A 40 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1961 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 36 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2220 mm |
