1982 Abarth A 112 vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1982 Abarth A 112 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1415 kg more than 1982 Abarth A 112.
Because 1969 Cadillac Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Abarth A 112 | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3300 mm |
