1982 Abarth A 112 vs. 1981 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1982 Abarth A 112 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Mustang weights approximately 670 kg more than 1982 Abarth A 112.
Because 1981 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Abarth A 112 | 1981 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1982 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 173 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2560 mm |