1982 Abarth A 112 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 633 kg more than 1982 Abarth A 112.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Abarth A 112 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 112 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1318 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2210 mm |
