1982 Abarth A 112 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 2,957 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 725 kg more than 1982 Abarth A 112.
Because 2005 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Abarth A 112 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | A 112 | Clio |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2957 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2480 mm |