1982 Abarth A 112 vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1982 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1982 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Abarth A 112 | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Abarth | Holden |
| Model | A 112 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
