1982 Abarth A 112 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 980 kg more than 1982 Abarth A 112.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Abarth A 112 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Abarth | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A 112 | CLK |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2720 mm |