1982 Abarth A 112 vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 929 kg more than 1982 Abarth A 112.
Because 2010 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1982 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1982 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Abarth A 112 | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
| Model | A 112 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1614 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3040 mm |
