1982 Abarth A 112 vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 955 kg more than 1982 Abarth A 112.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C has automatic transmission and 1982 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1982 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Abarth A 112 | 2010 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Abarth | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | A 112 | C |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2761 mm |
