1982 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 (133 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 (178 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Alfa Romeo Alfa 6 | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | Alfa 6 | 140 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66.2 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2620 mm |