1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,351 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud (79 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 9 kg more than 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud (104 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Riley |
Model | Alfasud | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1982 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 1351 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 876 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 25 L |