1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 178 more horse power than 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud.
Because 2010 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. (88 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | Alfasud | Commodore |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1186 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 88 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |