1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta vs. 2009 Ford Flex
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta weights approximately 54 kg more than 2009 Ford Flex.
Because 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta has manual transmission. 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta | 2009 Ford Flex | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | Alfetta | Flex |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1569 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 262 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3000 mm |
