1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 309 kg more than 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta.
Because 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta has manual transmission. 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | Alfetta | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1569 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2880 mm |
