1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 1287 kg more than 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta.
Because 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Volkswagen |
| Model | Alfetta | Polo |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1569 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 2307 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2470 mm |
