1982 Alfa Romeo GTV vs. 2000 Acura EL
To start off, 2000 Acura EL is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura EL weights approximately 19 kg more than 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV.
Because 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV | 2000 Acura EL | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Acura |
| Model | GTV | EL |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1569 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1079 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4478 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1704 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2619 mm |
