1982 Alfa Romeo GTV vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV would be higher. At 3,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Equator weights approximately 235 kg more than 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV.
Because 2010 Suzuki Equator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV has manual transmission. 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Suzuki |
| Model | GTV | Equator |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1569 cc | 3953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 261 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3560 mm |
