1982 Alpina B6 vs. 1996 Audi RS2
To start off, 1996 Audi RS2 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Alpina B6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi RS2 weights approximately 325 kg more than 1982 Alpina B6.
Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Alpina B6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Alpina B6 | 1996 Audi RS2 | |
| Make | Alpina | Audi |
| Model | B6 | RS2 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2226 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 311 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1595 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2600 mm |
