1982 Alpina B6 vs. 1999 Alfa Romeo 166
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1982 Alpina B6.
Because 1982 Alpina B6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Alpina B6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Alpina B6 | 1999 Alfa Romeo 166 | |
| Make | Alpina | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | B6 | 166 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 226 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2600 mm |
