1982 Alpina B6 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 110 kg more than 1982 Alpina B6.
Because 1982 Alpina B6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Alpina B6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Alpina B6 | 2000 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Alpina | Chevrolet |
| Model | B6 | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3135 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2720 mm |
