1982 Alpina B6 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Alpina B6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 350 kg more than 1982 Alpina B6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Alpina B6 | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Alpina | Cadillac |
| Model | B6 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2890 mm |
