1982 Alpina B6 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Alpina B6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Alpina B6 weights approximately 9 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva.
Because 1982 Alpina B6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Alpina B6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Alpina B6 | 2009 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Alpina | Chevrolet |
| Model | B6 | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2405 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 135 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1261 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2710 mm |
