1982 Alpina B6 vs. 2009 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Sable weights approximately 655 kg more than 1982 Alpina B6.
Because 2009 Mercury Sable is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Alpina B6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Alpina B6 | 2009 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Alpina | Mercury |
Model | B6 | Sable |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 263 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2870 mm |