1982 Alpine A 310 vs. 1976 Chrysler 160
To start off, 1982 Alpine A 310 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Alpine A 310 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Alpine A 310 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 101 kg more than 1982 Alpine A 310.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Alpine A 310 (208 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1982 Alpine A 310 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Alpine A 310 | 1976 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | Alpine | Chrysler |
Model | A 310 | 160 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 1639 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 208 Nm | 132 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2680 mm |