1982 Alpine A 310 vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Alpine A 310 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Alpine A 310 (148 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1982 Alpine A 310 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Alpine A 310. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Alpine A 310 | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A 310 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2490 mm |