1982 Aston Martin Lagonda vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Aston Martin Lagonda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Aston Martin Lagonda would be higher.
Because 1982 Aston Martin Lagonda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Aston Martin Lagonda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Aston Martin Lagonda | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Lagonda | Colt |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 309 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |