1982 Audi 100 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1982 Audi 100 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1982 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1982 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1982 Audi 100 has manual transmission. 1982 Audi 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 100 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 100 | 62 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 79 L |