1982 Audi 100 vs. 1994 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1994 Lotus Elan is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 100 would be higher. Both 1982 Audi 100 and 1994 Lotus Elan are equipped with a 1,588 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1982 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 100 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1994 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Lotus Elan (204 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1994 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi 100 | 1994 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Audi | Lotus |
| Model | 100 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2260 mm |
