1982 Audi 100 vs. 1995 Xedos 6
To start off, 1995 Xedos 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Xedos 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Xedos 6 (106 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1982 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Xedos 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Xedos 6 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1982 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Xedos 6 (138 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1995 Xedos 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 100 | 1995 Xedos 6 | |
Make | Audi | Xedos |
Model | 100 | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2620 mm |