1982 Audi 100 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1982 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 100 | 2006 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 100 | Impala |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3884 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 328 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |