1982 Audi 100 vs. 2006 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (216 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1982 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 100.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 100 | 2006 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | 100 | Ram |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |