1982 Audi 100 vs. 2006 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 100 would be higher.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 100. (124 Nm). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 100. 2006 Isuzu I-350 has automatic transmission and 1982 Audi 100 has manual transmission. 1982 Audi 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Isuzu I-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 100 | 2006 Isuzu I-350 | |
Make | Audi | Isuzu |
Model | 100 | I-350 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 124 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1750 mm |