1982 Audi 100 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 125 more horse power than 1982 Audi 100. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 100.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 100. (124 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 100 | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 100 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 124 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |