1982 Audi 100 vs. 2010 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2010 Renault Laguna is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Laguna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Laguna (168 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1982 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Laguna (270 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 100 | 2010 Renault Laguna | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | 100 | Laguna |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |