1982 Audi 200 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 200 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | 200 | XJ |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2995 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 335 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5127 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3032 mm |