1982 Audi 80 vs. 1950 Bristol 450
To start off, 1982 Audi 80 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 80 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450.
Because 1950 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 1950 Bristol 450 | |
Make | Audi | Bristol |
Model | 80 | 450 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 54 L |