1982 Audi 80 vs. 1950 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1982 Audi 80 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Talbot T 26 (276 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Audi 80 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1950 Talbot T 26.
Because 1950 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi 80 | 1950 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Audi | Talbot |
| Model | 80 | T 26 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2510 mm |
